www.cj-rickaddsite.blogspot.com: 2010

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Mining the Moon - Crystalinks

http://www.crystalinks.com/lunarmining.html

---
This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses.

Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar: http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Fwd: Correction: DAIR and More

-----Original Message-----
From: Rickcosmos <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 14, 2010 2:34 am
Subject: Correction: DAIR and More
Posted at associate: /group/rec.aviation.military

Exhausted resources not recourses. Please check out www.rickaddsite.blogspot.com or groups.google.com/ group/                 nasa-our-way or /group/rickcosmos-eclectic and Facebook: Rickaddsite. As a member of this group, I would like to draw your attention to our efforts regarding NASA. Hopefully, it will CAUSE you to join the CAUSE. Thank you, Rick.

Thursday, September 2, 2010

STEALING DEFEAT from the MOTH of VICTORY!

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Thu, Sep 2, 2010 9:51 pm
Subject: Deseret News | Nightly news: astronomy

Hatch agrees with Citizen Reporter.  http://www.deseretnews.com/blog/47/10009905/Nightly-news-astronomy-On-to-the-Moon.html  --- This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com.  Please note  that AddThis does not verify email addresses.  Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:  http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

REASON

Mini-editorial: We spent $9 billion on "Constellation" Program. Obama wants to start
from scratch - down the same presidential black hole as the money for stimulus packages - - they will have more company! House want to retain more of "Constellation" then Senate. "Citizen Reporter" - save with modification. Read "YOU are CORDIALLY INVITED to a FUNERAL" at /group/rickcosmos-eclectic and first five posts at www.rickaddsite. blogspot.com FIRST TWO POSTS: Motivated in part by "Constellation" - "Constellation" will accelerate the R & D into nuclear propulsion and safe/clean/cost-efficient nuclear thermal power plants - energy independence. NASA was considering making such research part of "Constellation."

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Fwd: What's missing from the bold plans for human spaceflight

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 12, 2010 6:43 pm
Subject: What's missing from the bold plans for human spaceflight Editor's Note:
House Bill retains more of CONSTELLATION puts emphasis on Capsule and Rocket now

and on Heavy-lifter later. Senate other way around. Best Plan: CITIZEN REPORTER; Second Place: Bush Plan; Third Place: House Plan; Fourth Place: Senate; Last: Obama. Senate-version likely to win (All plans outlined here and at www.rickaddsite.blogspot.com.Easier to find at latte)r.Call and/or leave messages at websites 9 key members of Congress - info here and rickkaddsite - - tomorrow and every day next week.Shuttle must be extended for 2 to 4 years. Humiliation: America no way to get to space station for which it paid bulk of cost; Russia (whom we beat in Moon Race) has made it clear that they will taxi astronauts for an astronomically high price and on their timetable. We reiterate: House-version makes more sense but neither plan calls for more then 3 more shuttle flights.

   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/07/AR2010080702494.html  --- This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com.  Please note  that AddThis does not verify email addresses.  Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:  http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

Friday, July 30, 2010

OBSERVATIONS ON 3 ARTICLES TO FOLLOW

EDITOR'S NOTE: There are members of NASA and of Congress who are proposing

replacing Ares 1 with a new version of the Space Shuttle. Like the present Space Shuttle

the new version would have virtually the same two solid booster rockets (as would Ares 1)

and the large external fuel tank. Instead of the space plane portion, it would have a

cylinder with an Orion spacecraft on top. This smaller version would likely carry 3

astronauts instead of 4 as would the Altair Moon Lander if New Moon Program isn't

canceled. The proposal also calls for the Ares 5 Heavy-Lifter or a version of it in order to

visit Mars or an asteroid. The 3-man Orion could dock with Space Station or with Altair

landing on moon. Both crafts would be about one-third smaller then originally planned

but one-third larger then Apollo and LM. The Mars Orion would still have to be capable of

carrying 6 astronauts. (groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic)

We at CR believe that this would be acceptable to us Ares 1 fans. There is a major

drawback though - there always is: It won't be operational for 3 to 4 years. Again, we

insist that present Shuttle (each of which have been certified capable for over 75 flights

apiece) be extended for 2 to 4 years. Alternative: Humiliation; NASA grounded for 3 years

or more. We would be dependent on Russia (who we beat in the Moon Race) and/or

China (our Banker) to talk us to our Space Station - we paid bulk of the cost - on their

schedule - - to add insult to injury, Russia has already made it clear that they are going to

charge us an astronomical price tag! Obama doesn't care about U.S. embarrassment

and is hell-bent on laying off Shuttle, Orion, Ares and Altair workers.

We stated previously that we were willing to forgo Moon Base due to price tag and offered

original proposals. Three moon missions each lasting 5 to 7 weeks visiting lunar arctic

and antarctic; 4 to 7 follow-up missions if justified by the 3 missions. One of the reasons,

President Bush wanted Americans to return to the moon was to test components,

equipment, experiments and procedures (as well as, tests on the ground, in earth orbit,

en route to moon) for a Mars mission in 2035. We can still due that and without a base.

We can do it during 3 or more moon missions. Hopefully, lunar mining will be encouraged

by what's learned during those missions. We shouldn't muck-up a pristine area for mining

(this is for the sake of environmental wackos, of course, they'll demand no mining). Joint

Project: NASA and Private Sector beginning in 2025 (if missions between 2020-2023 justify

it), geologists, metallurgists, surveyors and support teams explore an area scientifically and

for the purpose of determining if it is a potentially economically viable area for mining. The

private sector takes it from there. They will construct mining camps.

Additional Proposal: We might do the above plus built a small NASA Base if practical to use

moon water for service module: water for drinking (as well as, recycled urine) splitting water

for oxygen for breathing and hydrogen for nuclear thermal (see our proposals in four articles at

www.rickaddsite.blogspot.com) rocket engine. Launching Orion with it's service module from

moon orbit would be a lot cheaper then launching from earth's stronger gravitational field. We propose that The Heavy-Lifter might not be needed or we can make due with a smaller, less powerful one to bring transfer module to lunar orbit with just enough hydrogen to get there. We can

launch it to lunar orbit where the Orion Command and Service Module is already in lunar orbit.

Altair and unmanned crafts can bring water to service module and transfer module from lunar

surface - cheaper then lifting it from earth's surface.

The transfer module can use Ares 5 or 2 liquid (safer then solid; H aboard transfer module) booster rockets and large external fuel tank.

We also proposed a mini-Orion or and operational-version of AF X-37B - both of which would be

easier to move and maneuver from the ground then as regular satellite - using heavy-lifter to park

it near our GPSs to temporarily move them if they became a target during a war or replace them

when necessary as a backup.

Or, Obama Plan to place "NASA in a Casket," give SpaceX unrealistic timetable and make Russia

a super-power again! (Russia orders Obama to shrink Bush Missile Shield, Obama obeys, Russia

announces that it has unstoppable missile; Russia declares that it has fighter jet as good as our

best fighter - the F-22, Obama orders production to stop on F-22s).

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Fwd: Rocket and Space Technology

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sun, Jul 25, 2010 5:02 pm
Subject: Rocket and Space Technology

  http://www.braeunig.us/space/index.htm  --- This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com.  Please note  that AddThis does not verify email addresses.  Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:  http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Fwd: THREE LAUNCH PADS TO THE FUTURE

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sat, Jul 24, 2010 3:25 am
Subject: Fwd: THREE LAUNCH PADS TO THE FUTURE

groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic to associate /group/science-space-technology

1) SENATE Sub-Committee on Justice-Commerce-Science (that's logical!)

2) HOUSE Committee on Science-Technology 3) CITIZEN REPORTER groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic
1)A: 3 more Space Shuttle Flights B: Orion Continues C: Ares 1 cancelled D: Development begins on a new Heavy-Lifter somewhat based on Ares 5 begins next, completed 2016 E: Taxpayer money spent on private/commercial sector development of earth-to-orbit-to-earth capability - $6 billion over 8 years F: Moon Base Cancelled G: Money spent on NASA developing new technologies reduced 2)A: 2 more Space Shuttle flights B: Orion continues C: Ares 1 may or may not be cancelled D: Development of Heavy-Lifter largely-based on Ares 5 begins next year, completed by 2016 E: Taxpayer money for private sector - $4.5 over 8 years F: Moon Base cancelled G: Money spent on developing new technologies less then Senate Sub-Committee 3) A: Space Shuttle program extended for 2 to 4 years B: Orion continues C: Ares 1 continues D: Ares 5/Saturn S-N Combo More money spent developing new technologies, including, nuclear thermal propulsion and nuclear-generator E: Aid to private sector - less then $2 over 3 years for NASA consultation and use of NASA facilities F: Moon Base cancelled; 4 missions to Moon in 2020 and 2021 Lunar 'arctic' and 'antarctic' regions and 3 to 5 additional missions if justified by the 4 missions Plans subject to change as they go through congressional process. We must continue our plan to save NASA with monthly phone call and/or message left at website of the 9 key members of Congress; info available at www.rickaddsite.blogspot.com, rickscisite.blogspot.com, YouTube: Rickaddsite. Each of the 3 shuttles are certified for over 75 more missions. It's a disgrace for U.S. to be dependent on Russia (whom we beat in Moon Race and have made it abundantly clear that they are going to charge us an arm and a leg; what if they don't comply with our scheduling and scientific 'window' requirements) and/or China (our banker!) to take us to and from our Space Station - international my foot, we paid bulk of the cost! - for 4 to 6 years while we're grounded; important science to be done at Lunar poles; Ares 1 can get Orion or modified X-37B can get us to Space Station in 2 to 4 years; spend more to built on existing technology and create new technologies for economy's sake. Obama want the two top priorities of the National

Aeronautics and Space Administration to be: 1) Making Muslims feel good about themselves:

their historic contributions in science, math., engineering (International Psychotherapy and

2) Green 'Hockey Stick' pseudo-science. Obama learned science from scientific illiterate Al Gore!

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Fwd: File:Dyna-Soar on Titan booster.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Jun 28, 2010 11:53 am
Subject: File:Dyna-Soar on Titan booster.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

X-20 with Titan 'rocket'  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dyna-Soar_on_Titan_booster.jpg  --- This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com.  Please note  that AddThis does not verify email addresses.  Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:  http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

Fwd: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/Nuclear_thermal_rocket_en.svg

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 29, 2010 12:48 am
Subject: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/Nuclear_thermal_rocket_en.svg

Thermonuclear, usually, super-heated hydrogen gas generates thrust.  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/Nuclear_thermal_rocket_en.svg  --- This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com.  Please note  that AddThis does not verify email addresses.  Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:  http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

Fwd: NASA-NERVA-diagram.jpg (702×330)

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 29, 2010 12:50 am
Subject: NASA-NERVA-diagram.jpg (702×330)

NERVA engine  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/22/NASA-NERVA-diagram.jpg  --- This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com.  Please note  that AddThis does not verify email addresses.  Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:  http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

Fwd: X-33 - Single Stage to Orbit

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Jul 5, 2010 9:02 pm
Subject: X-33 - Single Stage to Orbit

Nearly completed when canceled was to lead to VentureStar which would have been  operational by now.   http://www.aerospaceguide.net/space_planes/x-33.html  --- This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com.  Please note  that AddThis does not verify email addresses.  Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar:  http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

Monday, June 21, 2010

Fwd: OUR PLAN TO SAVE NASA!

THE KEY 9: Shelby, Nelson, Sprat, Ryan, Conrad, Greg, your 2 senators

and 1 congressman. To leave message at their website - example: (www.-?)

shelby.senate.gov/public/ To secure phone numbers - Senate Operator:

202-224-3121; House Operator: 202-226-7200 (Senate operator will usually

give you senate and house numbers; you need not know names of your

senators and congressman but you most know name of state in which you

live!).

Extend lifespan of Shuttle for 2 to 4 years; Save most of Constellation Program.

List: First 2 are key NASA supporters; 3 and 5, Senate and House Budget

Committee Chairmen; 4 and 6, Ranking Members.

Rick grudgingly decided to be nice and give you 7 of he 9 numbers: Conrad,

202-224-3324; Greg, 202-224-2043; Sprat, 202-225-5507; Ryan, 202-225-3031;

Shelby, 202-224-5744; Nelson, 202-224-5275. He can't get the other 3 for you!

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

CRISES

CRISIS IS EXPLAINED A SHORT DISTANCE DOWN. Further down are the phone numbers of 9
key members of Congress. If you prefer, you can leave message or email them from
their website - example: (www.-?)shelby.senate.com/public/ Let's do it together, Rick.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Fwd: ORIGINAL THEORY and PROPOSALS

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Thu, Jun 3, 2010 1:11 pm
Subject: ORIGINAL THEORY and PROPOSALS

ORIGINAL THEORY and PROPOSALS

FUTURE PACKAGE: CONGRESS; BIG ONE:

"THE MYSTERY FLIGHT OF APRIL 23"; "Re Rebuttal"

YouTube: "CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE," "A VISION OF AMERICA's NASA's FUTURE,"

"NICK...COSMIC TRINITY: CITIZEN, CONSTITUTION, COSMOS"

NASA and the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION are the scientific/technological

engines are economy. We live in a Post-Industrialized or Service Economy and

no longer an Industrialized or Manufacturing Economy. We should have had

primarily a Service Economy with a strong Manufacturing base but that was

destroyed by unions. Can we maintain our technological edge and have a

moderate resurgence in manufacturing it depends on NASA. We must call for

the restoration of the NASA of the 1960's (visit: NASA.org and read - "NASA in

Our Home," "NASA Technology" and "NASA History"). NASA only receives a

paltry 1/2 of one per cent of federal budget and that just won't cut it, especially,

since, we get a $7 return on each dollar budgeted NASA - no government

department or agency or program can make that claim. There have been two

failed stimulus packages - most Americans are only aware of one do to fancy

liberal footwork. we must cut spending in real terms and reduce the growth of

spending in others. However, when it comes to national and domestic security -

some frozen, some growing. NASA should be the exception: the non-security -

in a direct sense - which necessitates growth.

It is our hope that after your read PACKAGE that you will call each of the key

members of congress every month until October, it might take until February.

Big NASA proponents: call the offices of Senators Shelby's (R; Alabama; 202-224-

5744) and Nelson's (D; Florida; 202-224-5274).

Believe it: staff members pay attention, especially, in an election year.

Senate Budget Committee: Chairman: Conrad - 202-224-3324; Ranking Member:

Greg - 202-224-2043

House Budget Committee: Chairman: Sprat - 202-225-5501; Ranking Member:

Ryan - 202-225-3031

Also contact every month, your two senators and congressman. You need not

know their names but you must know the name of the state in which you live!

Senate Operator: 202-224-3121...............................House Operator: 202-226-7200

Actually, yo can get all info from Senate Operator.

"The MYSTERY FLIGHT of APRIL 23" follows. The last component of package is

"Re Rebuttal." Visit: groups.google.com/group/sri-philosophy-chapter for rebuttal.

We are also associated with groups.google.com/group/troyphilosophysociety and

don't forget: rickcosmos-eclectic

Fwd: rebuttal

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: sri-philosophy-chapter@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 1, 2010 4:07 pm
Subject: Re-rebuttal

Al, your figures are off and Obama was misleading. He stated that he would increase NASA's budget by 6 billion over 5 years. He reduced NASA's budget by 2 and 1/2 billion in fiscal 2010, therefore, the increase is a paltry 3 1/2 billion.

He wants to shift NASA focus from space to 'hockey stick' pseudo-science. It's political

science not climatology. New U.N. term: Climate and endangered species. U.N. keeps

changing term every time public wakes up, sees how bogus it is and no longer

supports it. Global Warming to Climate Change to Climate and Species. 'Hockey'

sticks," fudged data, cattle farts, suppressed data during peer review and "Al Gore'

placing sensors near heat-generating sources.

T. "Bones" Pickens abandoned solar/'wind after study proved it to be impractical. We

need oil and/or natural gas from under water and/or on land and nuclear fission leading

to fusion. You rather purchase oil from countries that support terrorists and

whose environmental and safety standards are lower then U.S. and England. Obama

plan will result in energy bills quadrupling over next ten years. Energy Independence

should be our goal.

I'm with Hero Neil Armstrong: build on existing technology, as well as, create new

technology - and that's what CONSTELLATION does - Big Time.

-Richard DePersio (rickcosmos-eclectic@googlegroups.com).

Contact: Senators Shelby (R; Alabama; 202-224-5744) and Nelson (D; Florida; 202-

224-5272) endorse my plan in "The Mystery Flight of April 23" here and at: rickscisite.

blogspot.com and presentations at: YouTube: Rickkaddsite. Conact me if you want to

help support CONSTELLATION at: rrdd3939@aol.com).

Thank you, SRI.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

"CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE..."

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Loqqad | NASA: "COSMIC TRINITY" OFFICIAL ASSOCIATE

Friday, May 14, 2010

NASA.gov - None

rrdd3939@aol.com has sent you this article.

Personal Message:
NASA and NASA_Ares: Administrator: NASA; co-administrator: rickaddsite-
nasa-offical (of "Cosmic Trinity").

None

Click the following to access the link:
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/hd/HDGalleryCollection_archive_2.html

****************************

NASA Privacy Statement:
http://www.nasa.gov/about/highlights/HP_Privacy.html

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Fwd: FANTASY or REALITY: IN and OUT of PLATO'S CAVE

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Tue, May 11, 2010 9:05 pm
Subject: FANTASY or REALITY: IN and OUT of PLATO'S CAVE

by Richard DePersio

"Cosmic Trinity"-all components listed at: groups.google.com/group/

rickcosmos-eclectic, including, NASA_Ares (Facebook/Twitter)and YouTube:Rickaddsite

PREFACE:
"Between the idea

And the reality

Between the motion

And the act

-T.S. Eliot

"PLATO'S CAVE - NEW VERSION ( a scientific/philosophical perspective available

at: comsat-ak.blogspot.com).

Dr. Walter Jacobson, psychiatrist- RE: "PLATO'S CAVE - NEW VERSION (psychological perspective)

"this "common sense" world you speak of that we inhabit is NOT real. it is an illusion, we are not bodies, we are mind/consciousness. we have identified with an idea, that idea being ego, and the ego believes in time and space and bodies and disease and death. we invented this world and then forgot that we made it up, and now we can't wake ourselves up out of it...."

Dr. Deepak Chopra (Editor's Note: strange chap, feeling British today), physician turned new-age spiritual/alternative medicine practitioner-"Global Spirit" on "CUNY T.V.": Referring to ancient texts, "I'm not in the world, the world is in me. I'm not in the body, the body is in me. I'm not in the mind, the mind is in me.

The body, the world, the mind happen to me as I curve back within myself and

create again and again. This is scientific fact (Editor's Note: Why not? As we shall

soon see with Kaku). The world exists in your consciousness. The body exists

in your consciousness. Your thoughts exist in your consciousness. Consciousness

ultimate ground of being. The whole world rises and subsides. Shift of identity:

body from ego-based, separate self to unified universal self."

A nurse referring to what she considered a unique out-of-body experience in "Dealing

with Death" on "AmericanLife T.V.: (We paraphrase) They tell me that energy can't

be created or destroyed. Is consciousness like enery. Will it continue after death.

Maybe, you wouldn't be able to think about or order a pizza (Editor's Note: Tis a

pity; now editor feels Italian).

Physics or philosophical perspective: Our common sense world might be a corruption of reality. Reality might exist in the bizarre quantum world and ultimate reality in the stranger quantum/relativity world - if we can find it! Plato with one foot in this world and the other on a higher plane - so he thought. Will we have to except it, as well. (Brain singular or Brain/Mind two sides of same coin. Compliment each other. Will we need to have one foot in this world and the other in the quantum/relativity world?).

BACK IN PLATO'S CAVE:

IT's a commonsensical world of classical physics, chemistry and biology (with

a physics and mathematical foundation). Albeit, a shadowy depiction of reality.

Unbeknownst to those looking forward at the shadows on the wall to the right is an

opening and beyond the cave is the world of relitivity and the world of quantum - both

nonsensical in nature with quantum even further from the cave then relativity. Quantum

is reality. If and when, we create quantum relativity, we will have ultimate reality.

Quantum Relativity plus concepts which are in lock-step: no constants - time and

mass; nothing traveling faster then light except space-time; singularities; bosons,

mass and energy - two forms of same thing; things with mass such as protons

and electrons and things without mass such as visible and invisible light some times behaving like waves and some times like particles; quarks, charm,

strings, electrons in more then one place at the same time; twelve dimensions; many, perhaps, an infinite number of universes; an electron occupying a spot in space-time in one universe while it does the same in ours.

Brandon Carter proposed the philosophical concept known as the the anthropic principle in the early 1970's, wherein the universe appears to be fine-tuned for us to exist. He argued that if the big bang were slightly more energetic or the proton slightly less massive or the constant in E=MC Squared slightly larger or smaller or...well, you get the idea...life based on carbon and water couldn't exist. In the

1980s, when they theorized that there were twelve spatial dimensions plus time

and that of the four fundamental forces in nature (electromagnetism, strong and

weak nuclear forces being the other three) gravity by far is the weakest- they had

an explanation - - gravity was spread over the twelve dimensions. Carter had to

rain on his colleague's parade: If that weren't the case, carbon-based life even

the simplest couldn't exist. Some biologists pointed out that trillions of evolutionary

steps occurred in a certain order leading to intelligent life, including, humans.

This suggested "Intelligent Design" or just plain luck - one in a google not that google but a mathematical one) chance. This reporters favorite example is of two guys

examining plants and animals in a forest. One guy decides to leave message

for anybody that might happen by later. He gathers rocks and spells out "Good

Day" (He was British for an American would undoubtedly go with "Hello"). About

an hour later someone looks down from a cliff and sees the greeting and ponders:

I wonder if a stranger was kind enough to leave this greeting or if years ago or

millions of years ago there was an earthquake and the rocks fell from the cliff

and just happened to land spelling "Good Day"?

Scientists were gnawing at this bedeviling problem for over a couple of

decades when they felt they had came up with a satisfactory multi-verse 'theory.' If there are a large number of universes, perhaps, infinite there could be many or an infinite number of universes like ours with all of us existing in some or an infinite number of them and other people in others, universes like ours without life, others like ours with intelligent carbon/water-based life but no humans, universes with just dust and gas and no stars and planets, universes with different constants or particles or forces and life based a different solid and liquid.

What was the stronger motivation for the 'creation' of multi-universes: science or the possibility of God? Religion has to except science, the converse is not the case.

F. Lee Baily is representing cattle in a libel case against the "U.N. Council on

Climate Change" which claimed for over five years that cattle farts were a major

contributor to global warming. Recently, a janitor realized that the U.N. graph was

upside down or the bottom was up and the homosexual janitor reported his findings

to the top U.N. climatologists, meteorologists and atmospheric physicists -

the same hockey pucks (as Don Rickles would say) who created the infamous

'hockey stick' graph. A U.N. spokesman stated that a formal and official statement

of apology was forthcoming a long with a large heaping of oats.

As anybody else noticed that something has changed over the past thirty years,

especially, ten led by physicist Michio Kaku.Science is based on Fact and Religion

is based on Faith. Many, if not most, would say that both are important and some

cases look at the same thing from a different perspective. You accept or reject

a scientific concept and you believe or disbelieve a religious one. Yet, over past thirty,

especially, ten more and more scientists, especially, physicists are using the

term 'believe' when talking about quarks, strings, brains (membranes), photons

electrons, inflation, dark matter and energy, faster then light travel, electrons,

bosons, etc. Much ado about nothing; it's just a matter of semantics. Leader of

the pack Kaku can't differentiate between speculation and fact. You might say

that religion is speculation. And, that there is scientific speculation backed up

by math or reasoning, theory, widely accepted theory and fact. It could take decades

to go from one step to the next or be disproved at some point on the path.

Sometimes, something could be proven on paper mathematically but it had to

remain speculation if we couldn't make the necessary observations or conduct

the required experiments until such capability became available?

What in Heaven or Quantum happened? Precent-day global-warming is a fact

even though four of the seven major studies released over the past six years indicate

little or no global warming, one points toward global cooling and two moderate-

to large-scale global warming caused by humans or a change in the energy output

of the sun or both- they don't know. Where is Al Gore with his five mansions and

private planes? Increasing the size if his carbon footprint while he places sensors

near heat-generating sources! Cap-and-Trade and Global Warming are politics not

science!

For God's Sake or Mother Nature's...Kaku and the gang are excepting

mathematically-proven speculation as fact. Or they jump quickly from theory

to widely excepted theory or from widely excepted theory to fact. THEY BELIEVE

IN THINGS THAT THEY CAN'T DETECT! They sound more like scientific theologians,

evangelical ministers and fundamentalist preachers!

On the other hand,out of opening to the left of the cave, you got the Bible. It contains God, angels, devils, and is, chock-full of miracles and prophecies. And, God can be in more then one place at a time (sound familiar?!?) and He can't be detected, yet, people swear that He is there - intelligent people - - the ones the liberal elites (We say callow sciolists) look down at from their ivory towers. Jesus can be flesh and spirit. Matter and anti-matter, magnetic north and south, positive and negative charges. Mind and Brain? Ying and Yang.

When asked: who created God; the theologian responds that He always was, is

and will be. Ask astrophysicist the same question and he answers other universes were and that there will be universes forever. Or, our universe oscillates - expands,

contracts, expands - - always has and will. He'll tell you that you can't get something

from nothing. What was there before singularity banged? Space. Nothing became

something. No, space with twelve dimensions and potential regular and dark matter

and energy, as well as potential anti- regular, anti dark and time.

Some Hindu sects wonder if god created man or man created God and if God

is dreaming universe, including, us or if we are dreaming universe, including, God.

Sit back and think. Either it's all rather silly or duality: they are both true. Electrons

are in more then one place on Mondays, Wednesday and Fridays while God is on

Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays and they rest on Sundays but not absolute rest.

Brain or duality: Mind/Brain?

"God's first Creature, which was Light."

-Francis Bacon

This journalist maintains that environment creates mind - with a nod in the direction

of Kaku.

"For what a man would like to be true,

that he more readily believes."

-Francis Bacon

Nay; the journey must continue...

It's the next day and this here reporter is returning to this here cave(Editor's Note:English teachers and professors would cry foul at this here construction but this here editor

cuts his ace reporter slack. And, he has no use for schools and colleges for

he contends that the genesis was in the 1920's and incline to the 1960's was only

about 5 degrees. The first and biggest teacher's union was created in the early

1960's and the incline got steep from 5 to 165-fell over left!...Is my A.D.D. showing?... Public elementary and high schools

and to a lesser degree private schools, most of which are Christian, most of which

are Catholic, as well as, virtually all public and private and to a less degree

Christian have gone from being institution of learning to institutions of indoctrination

in liberal philosophy - starting with American history and now in all subjects,including,

math.!).

Many Hindus believe that God creates universe for fun and see everyone having

fun while all he gets to do is sit back and watch and so he becomes part of universe and forgets his identity until next sleep period and while part of universe, therefore,

humans are god too.

What about our friend Plato. The soul is eternal in heaven except to period it

occupies imperfect body. When we learn something new, we are actually

remembering something we knew on the higher plane or heaven but in an imperfect

way because of body. We make a point and it has a little bit of length, width and

depth while the real point doesn't and it doesn't exist anywhere in space and time.

Objects sch as chairs, circles and spheres (he latter two being the most perfect

geometrical shapes to Plato) or concepts such as justice and truth were perfect

forms in heaven. Some humans could perceive better then other (Plato: usually,

philosophers) let's say: between shadow and reality.

Hey! Let's get back to anthropic principle.

Paul Davies felt that there are seven possible consequences of Brandon Carter's

'AP.'

The absurd universe: Our universe just happens to be the way that it is;
The unique universe: There s a deep underlying unity in physics which necessitate the universe being the way that it is; Some "Theory ofEverything." will explain why the various features of the universe must have exactly the values that we see;
The multi-universe: Multiple universes exist, having all possible combinations of characteristics and we inevitably find ourselves within a universe that allows for us to exist;
Creationism: A Creator designed the universe with the purpose of supporting complexity and the emergence of intelligence;
The life principle:There is an underlying principle that constrains the universe toward life and mind;
The self-explaining universe: A closed explanatory loop "perhaps only universes with a capacity for consciousness can exist." This is Wheeler's "Participatory Anthropic Principle" ('PAP');
We live in a 'Virtual Reality Simulation.'

What does the future hold? Either, various theories for generating eclectic

multi-universes will be will prove robust or evidence that the universe is fine-tuned

When simpler earlier versions appeared they were shrugged off by scientists. Scientists said of Carter's Principle: It's philosophy not science; it's mere speculation; it can't be proven or dis-proven and, therefore resides outside of the scientific realm.

Then why did it seem to trouble them so. Why does it appear that it was the

primary impetus in conceiving the concept of "Parallel Universes" - title of a Kaku

book. Why do they sound more and more like philosophers and theologians - similar

occupatiosns - don't feel like debating point - - scientists don't seem to feel like

their old selfs.s

And what about Jacobson, Chopra (This reporter believes that he is Indian but

born in America and was once on a Hindu and once your writer heard him expound

crazy on the Middle East)...and the journalist!

It would appear that they are heavy on 7, light on 4 with a pinch of Hinduism

We shall converse with Dr. Jacobson.(Chopra is in Plato's Cave discussing the

Middle East with his mummy)'

As for the ace reporter, he isn't ready to commit at this time. CMT; fingers hurt.

Don't 'poor, baby' me. ORIGINAL PROPOSAL - THE MONO/GEMINI PRINCIPLE:

Possibility One: Quantum Relativity is silly, fantasy, fairy tale world or makes

perfect sense if you think out of the box - way out of the box - - thousands of miles

from the cave;

Possibility Two: The Bible is silly, fantasy, fairy tale world or makes perfect

sense and perfectly depicts reality - thousands of miles from the cave - - in the other

direction.

Possibility Three: If you except one, you have to except the other - it's quantum

relativity on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays while Spirituality prevails on Tuesdays,

Thursdays, Saturday and Brahma sleeps for one Brahma day.

Possibilty Four: Our mind isn't capable of understanding it self and the greater

universe.

Possibility Five: We need to return to Plato's Cave real soon!

www.cj-rickaddsite.blogspot.com